Jump to main navigation

«
»

Workshop 15.1 - Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS)

14 Jan 2013

Basic statistics references

  • Legendre and Legendre
  • Quinn & Keough (2002) - Chpt 17

Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS)

The following example is designed to help you appreciate the link between distance measures and ordination space (MDS). The data set consists of distances (km) between major Australia cities (as the crow flies), and is in the form of a triangular matrix.

Download austcities data set
Format of austcites.csv data file
 CanberraSydneyMelbourne..
Canberra0NANA..
Sydney2460NA..
Melbourne4677130..
Adelaide9581160653..
Perth309032902720..
..........
Australian cities

Open the veg data set.
Show code
> austcities <- read.csv("../downloads/data/austcities.csv")
> austcities

           Canberra Sydney Melbourne Adelaide Perth Broome Alice Darwin Cairns Townsville Brisbane
Canberra          0     NA        NA       NA    NA     NA    NA     NA     NA         NA       NA
Sydney          246      0        NA       NA    NA     NA    NA     NA     NA         NA       NA
Melbourne       467    713         0       NA    NA     NA    NA     NA     NA         NA       NA
Adelaide        958   1160       653        0    NA     NA    NA     NA     NA         NA       NA
Perth          3090   3290      2720     2130     0     NA    NA     NA     NA         NA       NA
Broome         3280   3380      3120     2490  1680      0    NA     NA     NA         NA       NA
Alice          1950   2030      1890     1330  1990   1370     0     NA     NA         NA       NA
Darwin         3130   3150      3150     2620  2650   1110  1290      0     NA         NA       NA
Cairns         2060   1960      2320     2120  3440   2500  1450   1680      0         NA       NA
Townsville     1790   1680      2070     1920  3390   2590  1420   1860    281          0       NA
Brisbane        941    731      1370     1600  3610   3320  1960   2850   1390       1110        0
Hobart          860   1060       597     1160  3010   3640  2460   3730   2890       2630     1790
           Hobart
Canberra       NA
Sydney         NA
Melbourne      NA
Adelaide       NA
Perth          NA
Broome         NA
Alice          NA
Darwin         NA
Cairns         NA
Townsville     NA
Brisbane       NA
Hobart          0

Note the format of the file, it is a triangular distance matrix.

  1. While the file is a distance matrix, at this stage R is unaware of it, we must manually make it aware (a round about way of saying that we must type a command to force R to treat the data set as a distance matrix. Convert the data frame into a distance matrix (HINT).
    Show code
    > austcities <- as.dist(austcities)
> austcities

               Canberra Sydney Melbourne Adelaide Perth Broome Alice Darwin Cairns Townsville Brisbane
Sydney          246                                                                               
Melbourne       467    713                                                                        
Adelaide        958   1160       653                                                              
Perth          3090   3290      2720     2130                                                     
Broome         3280   3380      3120     2490  1680                                               
Alice          1950   2030      1890     1330  1990   1370                                        
Darwin         3130   3150      3150     2620  2650   1110  1290                                  
Cairns         2060   1960      2320     2120  3440   2500  1450   1680                           
Townsville     1790   1680      2070     1920  3390   2590  1420   1860    281                    
Brisbane        941    731      1370     1600  3610   3320  1960   2850   1390       1110         
Hobart          860   1060       597     1160  3010   3640  2460   3730   2890       2630     1790

    2. We are now ready to perform the MDS for the purpose of examining the ordination plot.

  2. Perform an MDS with 2 dimensions on the city distances matrix (HINT).
    Show code
    > library(vegan)
> austcities.mds <- metaMDS(austcities, k = 2)

    Run 0 stress 0 
Run 1 stress 0.169 
Run 2 stress 0.13 
Run 3 stress 0 
... procrustes: rmse 0.003944  max resid 0.006698 
*** Solution reached
    1. What was the final stress value (as a percentage)?
      Show code
      > austcities.mds$stress

      [1] 0
    2. What does this stress value suggest about the success of the MDS?
    3. Generate a Shepard diagram. The Shepard diagram (plot) represents the relationship between the original distances (y-axis) and the new MDS ordination distances (x-axis). Does this and the stress value indicate that the patterns present in the original distance matrix (crow flies distances between cities) are adequately reproduced from the 2 new dimensions?
      Show code
      > stressplot(austcities.mds)
      plot of chunk ws15.1Q1.2c
  3. Generate an ordination plot. The final ordination plot summarizes the relationship between the cities. Does this ordination plot approximate the true geographical arrangement of the cities?
    Show code
    > ordiplot(austcities.mds, display = "sites", type = "n")
> text(austcities.mds, lab = rownames(austcities.mds$points))
    plot of chunk ws15.1Q1.3a
    Recall that the orientation of points in a MDS ordination plot is arbitrary. Unlike PCA and CA, the points are not orientated towards axes explaining most variance. Instead the two new dimensions simply provide the space or scope in which the points are arranged. What if we rotated the points 140 degrees. Does this make the patterns easier to relate back to reality?
    Show code
    > library(shape)
> austcities.rot <- rotatexy(austcities.mds$points, angle = 140)
> plot(austcities.rot, type = "n")
> text(austcities.rot, lab = rownames(austcities.mds$points))
    plot of chunk ws15.1Q1.3b
  4. In this case, what might the two new MDS dimensions (variables) represent? (hint think of the ordination plot as a map)

Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS)

Mac Nally (1989) studied geographic variation in forest bird communities. His data set consists of the maximum abundance for 102 bird species from 37 sites that where further classified into five different forest types (Gippsland manna gum, montane forest, woodland, box-ironbark and river redgum and mixed forest). He was primarily interested in determining whether the bird assemblages differed between forest types.

Download the macnally data set
Format of macnally_full.csv data file
SITEHABITATV1GST..
Reedy LakeMixed3.4..
PearcedaleGippland Manna Gum3.4..
VarneetGippland Manna Gum8.4..
CranbourneGippland Manna Gum3.0..
LysterfieldMixed5.6..
........
trout

Open the macnally_full data set.
Show code
> macnally <- read.csv("../downloads/data/macnally_full.csv")
> macnally

                         HABITAT  GST EYR   GF  BTH GWH WTTR WEHE WNHE  SFW WBSW   CR  LK  RWB AUR
Reedy Lake                 Mixed  3.4 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 11.9  0.4  0.0  1.1 3.8  9.7 0.0
Pearcedale           Gipps.Manna  3.4 9.2  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 11.5  8.3 12.6  0.0 0.5 11.6 0.0
Warneet              Gipps.Manna  8.4 3.8  0.7  2.8 0.0  0.0 10.7 12.3  4.9 10.7  0.0 1.9 16.6 2.3
Cranbourne           Gipps.Manna  3.0 5.0  0.0  5.0 2.0  0.0  3.0 10.0  6.9 12.0  0.0 2.0 11.0 1.5
Lysterfield                Mixed  5.6 5.6 12.9 12.2 9.5  2.1  7.9 28.6  9.2  5.0 19.1 3.6  5.7 8.8
Red Hill                   Mixed  8.1 4.1 10.9 24.5 5.6  6.7  9.4  6.7  0.0  8.9 12.1 6.7  2.7 0.0
Devilbend                  Mixed  8.3 7.1  6.9 29.1 4.2  2.0  7.1 27.4 13.1  2.8  0.0 2.8  2.4 2.8
Olinda                     Mixed  4.6 5.3 11.1 28.2 3.9  6.5  2.6 10.9  3.1  8.6  9.3 3.8  0.6 1.3
Fern Tree Gum     Montane Forest  3.2 5.2  8.3 18.2 3.8  4.2  2.8  9.0  3.8  5.6 14.1 3.2  0.0 0.0
Sherwin       Foothills Woodland  4.6 1.2  4.6  6.5 2.3  5.2  0.6  3.6  3.8  3.0  7.5 2.4  0.6 0.0
Heathcote Ju      Montane Forest  3.7 2.5  6.3 24.9 2.8  7.4  1.3  4.7  5.5  9.5  5.7 2.9  0.0 1.8
Warburton         Montane Forest  3.8 6.5 11.1 36.1 6.2  8.5  2.3 25.4  8.2  5.9 10.5 3.1  9.8 1.6
Millgrove                  Mixed  5.4 6.5 11.9 19.6 3.3  8.6  2.5 11.9  4.3  5.4 10.8 6.5  2.7 2.0
Ben Cairn                  Mixed  3.1 9.3 11.1 25.9 9.3  8.3  2.8  2.8  2.8  8.3 18.5 3.1  0.0 3.1
Panton Gap        Montane Forest  3.8 3.8 10.3 34.6 7.9  4.8  2.9  3.7  4.8  7.2  5.9 3.1  0.6 3.8
OShannassy                 Mixed  9.6 4.0  5.4 34.9 7.0  5.1  2.6  6.4  3.9 11.3 11.6 2.3  0.0 2.3
Ghin Ghin                  Mixed  3.4 2.7  9.1 16.1 1.3  3.2  4.7  0.0 22.0  5.8  7.4 4.5  0.0 0.0
Minto                      Mixed  5.6 3.3 13.3 28.0 7.0  8.3  7.0 38.9 10.5  7.0 14.0 5.2  1.7 5.2
Hawke                      Mixed  1.7 2.6  5.5 16.0 4.3  6.7  3.5  5.9  6.7 10.0  3.7 2.1  0.5 1.5
St Andrews    Foothills Woodland  4.7 3.6  6.0 25.2 3.7  7.5  4.7 10.0  0.0  0.0  4.0 5.1  2.8 3.7
Nepean        Foothills Woodland 14.0 5.6  5.5 20.0 3.0  6.6  7.0  3.3  7.0 10.0  4.7 3.3  2.1 3.7
Cape Schanck               Mixed  6.0 4.9  4.9 16.2 3.4  2.6  2.8  9.4  6.6  7.8  5.1 5.2 21.3 0.0
Balnarring                 Mixed  4.1 4.9 10.7 21.2 3.9  0.0  5.1  2.9 12.1  6.1  0.0 2.7  0.0 0.0
Bittern              Gipps.Manna  6.5 9.7  7.8 14.4 5.2  0.0 11.5 12.5 20.7  4.9  0.0 0.0 16.1 5.2
Bailieston          Box-Ironbark  6.5 2.5  5.1  5.6 4.3  5.7  6.2  6.2  1.2  0.0  0.0 1.6  5.0 4.1
Donna Buang                Mixed  1.5 0.0  2.2  9.6 6.7  3.0  8.1  0.0  0.0  7.3  8.1 1.5  2.2 0.7
Upper Yarra                Mixed  4.7 3.1  7.0 17.1 8.3 12.8  1.3  6.4  2.3  5.4  5.4 2.4  0.6 2.3
Gembrook                   Mixed  7.5 7.5 12.7 16.4 4.7  6.4  1.6  8.9  9.3  6.4  4.8 3.6 14.5 4.7
Arcadia            River Red Gum  3.1 0.0  1.2  0.0 1.2  0.0  0.0  1.8  0.7  0.0  0.0 1.8  0.0 2.5
Undera             River Red Gum  2.7 0.0  2.2  0.0 1.3  6.5  0.0  0.0  6.5  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 2.2
Coomboona          River Red Gum  4.4 0.0  2.1  0.0 0.0  3.3  0.0  0.0  0.8  0.0  0.0 2.8  0.0 2.2
Toolamba           River Red Gum  3.0 0.0  0.5  0.0 0.8  0.0  0.0  0.0  1.6  0.0  0.0 2.0  0.0 2.5
Rushworth           Box-Ironbark  2.1 1.1  3.2  1.8 0.5  4.8  0.9  5.3  4.8  0.0  1.1 1.1 26.3 1.6
Sayers              Box-Ironbark  2.6 0.0  1.1  7.5 1.6  5.2  3.6  6.9  6.7  0.0  2.7 1.6  8.0 1.6
Waranga                    Mixed  3.0 1.6  1.5  3.0 0.0  3.0  0.0 14.5  6.7  0.0  0.7 4.0 23.0 1.6
Costerfield         Box-Ironbark  7.1 2.2  4.5  9.0 2.7  6.0  2.5  7.7  9.5  0.0  7.7 2.2  8.9 1.9
Tallarook     Foothills Woodland  4.3 2.9  8.7 14.4 2.9  5.8  2.8 11.1  2.9  0.0  3.8 2.9  2.9 1.9
              STTH   LR WPHE  YTH  ER PCU  ESP SCR RBFT BFCS WAG WWCH NHHE   VS CST  BTR AMAG  SCC
Reedy Lake     0.0  4.8 27.3  0.0 5.1 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.6 1.9  0.0  0.0  0.0 1.7 12.5  8.6 12.5
Pearcedale     0.0  3.7 27.6  0.0 2.7 0.0  3.7 0.0  1.1  1.1 3.4  0.0  6.9  0.0 0.9  0.0  0.0  0.0
Warneet        2.8  5.5 27.5  0.0 5.3 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  1.5 2.1  0.0  3.0  0.0 1.5  0.0  0.0  0.0
Cranbourne     0.0 11.0 20.0  0.0 2.1 0.0  2.0 0.0  5.0  1.4 3.4  0.0 32.0  0.0 1.4  0.0  0.0  0.0
Lysterfield    7.0  1.6  0.0  0.0 1.4 0.0  3.5 0.7  0.0  2.7 0.0  0.0  6.4  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Red Hill      16.8  3.4  0.0  0.0 2.2 0.0  3.4 0.0  0.7  2.0 0.0  0.0  2.2  5.4 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Devilbend     13.9  0.0 16.7  0.0 0.0 0.0  5.5 0.0  0.0  3.6 0.0  0.0  5.6  5.6 4.6  0.0  0.0  0.0
Olinda        10.2  0.0  0.0  0.0 1.2 0.0  5.1 0.0  0.7  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  1.9 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Fern Tree Gum 12.2  0.6  0.0  0.0 1.3 2.8  7.1 0.0  1.9  0.6 0.0  0.0  0.0  4.2 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Sherwin       11.3  5.8  0.0  9.6 2.3 2.9  0.6 3.0  0.0  1.2 0.0  9.8  0.0  5.1 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Heathcote Ju  12.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 2.8  0.9 2.6  0.0  0.0 0.0 11.7  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Warburton      7.6 15.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 1.8  7.6 0.0  0.9  1.5 0.0  0.0  0.0  3.9 2.5  0.0  0.0  0.0
Millgrove      8.6  0.0  0.0  0.0 6.5 2.5  5.4 2.0  5.4  2.2 0.0  0.0  0.0  5.4 3.2  0.0  0.0  0.0
Ben Cairn     12.0  3.3  0.0  0.0 0.0 2.5  7.4 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  2.1  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Panton Gap    17.3  2.4  0.0  0.0 0.0 3.1  9.2 0.0  3.7  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
OShannassy     7.8  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 1.5  3.1 0.0  9.6  0.7 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Ghin Ghin      8.1  2.7  8.4  8.4 3.4 0.0  0.0 0.0 44.7  0.4 1.3  0.0  0.4  0.6 0.6  0.0  8.4 47.6
Minto         25.2  0.0 15.4  0.0 0.0 0.0  3.3 0.0 10.5  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 3.5  0.0  6.7 80.5
Hawke          9.0  4.8  0.0  0.0 0.0 2.1  3.7 0.0  0.0  0.7 0.0  3.2  0.0  0.0 1.5  0.0  0.0  0.0
St Andrews    15.8  3.4  0.0  9.0 0.0 3.7  5.6 4.0  0.9  0.0 0.0 10.0  0.0  0.0 2.7  0.0  0.0  0.0
Nepean        12.0  2.2  0.0  0.0 3.7 0.0  4.0 2.0  0.0  1.1 0.0  0.0  1.1  4.5 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Cape Schanck   0.0  4.3  0.0  0.0 6.4 0.0  4.6 0.0  3.4  0.0 0.0  0.0 33.3  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Balnarring     4.9 16.5  0.0  0.0 9.1 0.0  3.9 0.0  2.7  1.0 0.0  0.0  4.9 10.1 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Bittern        0.0  0.0 27.7  0.0 2.3 0.0  0.0 0.0  2.3  2.3 6.3  0.0  2.6  0.0 1.3  0.0  0.0  0.0
Bailieston     9.8  0.0  0.0  8.7 0.0 0.0  0.0 6.2  0.0  1.6 0.0 10.0  0.0  2.5 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Donna Buang    5.2  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 1.5  7.4 0.0  0.0  1.5 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 1.5  0.0  0.0  0.0
Upper Yarra    6.4  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 1.3  2.3 0.0  6.4  0.9 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Gembrook      24.3  2.4  0.0  0.0 3.6 0.0 26.6 4.7  2.8  0.0 0.0  0.0  4.8  9.7 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Arcadia        0.0  2.7 27.6  0.0 4.3 3.7  0.0 0.0  0.6  2.1 4.9  8.0  0.0  0.0 1.8  6.7  3.1 24.0
Undera         7.5  3.1 13.5 11.5 2.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  1.9 2.5  6.5  0.0  3.8 0.0  4.0  3.2 16.0
Coomboona      3.1  1.7 13.9  5.6 4.6 1.1  0.0 0.0  0.0  6.9 3.3  5.6  0.0  3.3 1.0  4.2  5.4 30.4
Toolamba       0.0  2.5 16.0  0.0 5.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.8  3.0 3.5  5.0  0.0  0.0 0.8  7.0  3.7 29.9
Rushworth      3.2  0.0  0.0 10.7 3.2 0.0  0.0 1.1  2.7  1.1 0.0  9.6  0.0  2.7 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Sayers         7.5  2.7  0.0 20.2 1.1 0.0  0.0 2.6  0.0  0.5 0.0  5.6  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Waranga        0.0  8.9 25.3  2.2 3.4 0.0  0.0 0.0 10.9  1.6 2.4  8.9  0.0  0.0 0.7  5.5  2.7  0.0
Costerfield    9.3  1.1  0.0 15.8 1.1 0.0  0.0 5.5  0.0  1.3 0.0  5.7  0.0  3.3 1.1  5.5  0.0  0.0
Tallarook      4.6 10.3  0.0  2.9 0.0 0.0  5.8 5.6  0.0  1.5 0.0  2.8  0.0  3.8 3.4  0.0  0.0  0.0
               RWH  WSW STP YFHE WHIP GAL  FHE BRTH SPP  SIL GCU MUSK MGLK BHHE RFC YTBC LYRE  CHE
Reedy Lake     0.6  0.0 4.8  0.0  0.0 4.8 26.2  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 13.1  1.7  1.1 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Pearcedale     2.3  5.7 0.0  1.1  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 1.1  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Warneet        1.4 24.3 3.1 11.7  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 4.6  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Cranbourne     0.0 10.0 4.0  0.0  0.0 2.8  0.0  0.0 0.8  0.0 0.0  0.0  1.4  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Lysterfield    7.0  0.0 0.0  6.1  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 5.4  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Red Hill       6.8  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 3.4  2.7 1.4  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Devilbend      7.3  3.6 2.4  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  1.2 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Olinda         9.1  0.0 0.0  0.0  2.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 2.0  0.0 2.6  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  1.9  0.0  0.0
Fern Tree Gum  4.5  0.0 0.0  0.0  3.2 0.0  0.0  0.0 2.6  4.9 1.3  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  2.6  0.6  0.6
Sherwin        6.3  0.0 3.5  2.3  0.0 0.0  0.0  6.0 4.2  1.2 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Heathcote Ju   5.9  0.0 4.4  4.7  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 3.7  2.5 1.5  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  1.8  0.0  0.0
Warburton      0.0  0.0 2.7  6.2  3.3 0.0  0.0  0.0 6.2  4.6 5.7  0.0  0.0  7.4 0.0  3.9  1.4  0.0
Millgrove      8.8  0.0 2.2  5.4  2.6 0.0  0.0  0.0 5.3  3.2 1.1  0.0  0.0  0.9 0.0  1.9  0.0  2.2
Ben Cairn      0.0  0.0 0.0  0.9  3.7 0.0  0.0  0.0 3.7 12.0 2.1  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  3.7  0.0  5.6
Panton Gap     0.0  0.0 1.2  4.9  3.8 0.0  0.0  0.0 1.9  2.4 2.9  0.0  0.0  7.7 0.0  0.0  2.4  1.8
OShannassy     3.9  0.0 3.1  8.5  2.9 0.0  0.0  0.0 2.2  3.7 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  1.5  1.6  8.1
Ghin Ghin      6.1  4.7 1.2  6.7  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 4.5  6.7 0.0  0.0  2.7  0.0 1.3  0.0  0.0  0.0
Minto          5.0  0.0 5.0 26.7  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 5.0 17.5 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 2.8  0.0  0.0  0.0
Hawke          4.2  0.0 0.0  3.2  0.0 0.0  0.0  5.2 3.7  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.5 0.0  0.0  1.7  0.0
St Andrews     8.4  0.0 5.1  5.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 10.0 5.1  0.9 3.4  0.0  0.0  1.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Nepean         3.3  0.0 0.0  1.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 4.7  1.1 0.0  0.0  0.0  5.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  5.6
Cape Schanck   2.6  0.0 0.0  3.4  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  5.2
Balnarring     4.9  0.0 0.0  1.9  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 10.3 0.0  0.0  0.0  3.9 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Bittern        0.0 12.5 2.3 19.5  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 3.5  8.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  2.3 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Bailieston     7.3  0.0 0.0  1.1  0.0 0.0  1.2  0.0 2.8  0.8 0.0  0.0  0.0 14.1 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Donna Buang    0.0  0.0 2.2  0.0  3.7 0.0  0.0  0.0 3.7  4.4 4.4  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  3.6  3.0  1.5
Upper Yarra    7.0  0.0 6.4  3.9  0.9 0.0  0.0  0.0 3.9  2.3 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.6 0.0  0.8  0.9  0.9
Gembrook      10.9  0.0 0.0 20.2  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 4.5  1.8 1.8  0.0  0.0  5.6 0.0  5.5  0.0 11.2
Arcadia        0.0  2.7 8.2  0.0  0.0 4.1  0.0  0.0 0.0  9.8 0.0  0.0  3.7  0.0 4.3  0.0  0.0  0.0
Undera         1.5  1.0 8.7  0.0  0.0 8.6  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  1.6  0.0 1.5  0.0  0.0  0.0
Coomboona      1.1  0.0 8.1  0.0  0.0 5.4  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  2.3  0.0 2.6  0.0  0.0  0.0
Toolamba       0.0  6.0 4.5  0.0  0.0 7.8  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  1.6  0.0 2.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Rushworth      4.3  0.0 1.1 14.4  0.0 0.0  9.6 11.7 3.2  2.7 1.1 16.0  0.0  9.9 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Sayers         3.7  0.0 0.0  8.0  0.0 0.0  3.1  9.1 5.7  3.7 1.6  3.1  0.0  7.8 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Waranga        1.4  3.4 2.7 16.3  0.0 5.9 14.8  0.0 2.2  0.0 0.0 20.0  0.0  8.1 2.7  0.0  0.0  0.0
Costerfield    6.2  0.0 6.6  0.6  0.0 0.0 15.9 13.9 6.3  3.9 1.6  3.8  0.0 10.8 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Tallarook      9.5  0.0 1.9  5.8  0.0 0.0  0.0 30.6 8.3  0.0 0.9  0.0  0.0  2.3 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
              OWH  TRM  MB STHR LHE FTC PINK OBO  YR LFB SPW RBTR DWS BELL  LWB CBW GGC PIL SKF
Reedy Lake    0.0 15.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0  0.0 0.4  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.9
Pearcedale    0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 2.3  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Warneet       0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 3.5  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cranbourne    0.0  0.0 1.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 5.5  0.0  4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Lysterfield   0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 2.1  0.0 1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 22.1  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Red Hill      0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Devilbend     0.0  0.0 3.6  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 1.8  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Olinda        0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 2.6  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Fern Tree Gum 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 2.6  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 1.3 1.3 0.0
Sherwin       0.0  0.0 1.2  0.0 0.0 1.7  0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.6 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.6 0.0 0.0 2.3
Heathcote Ju  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.9 0.0 1.6  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  1.6 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Warburton     0.0  0.0 0.0  1.4 2.1 2.1  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 1.8 0.7 0.0
Millgrove     0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 3.5  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  1.1 0.9  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ben Cairn     3.7  0.0 0.0  0.0 4.1 4.6  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 3.7 2.8 0.0
Panton Gap    0.6  0.0 0.0  0.9 1.8 3.1  1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 4.8 1.8 0.0
OShannassy    0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 2.4 5.4  2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2 0.0
Ghin Ghin     0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 2.4  0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8
Minto         2.8  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 1.7  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7
Hawke         0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 1.1  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  1.7 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
St Andrews    0.0  0.0 1.7  0.0 0.0 3.4  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.9 15.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0
Nepean        0.0  0.0 2.2  0.0 0.0 1.9  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cape Schanck  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 1.7  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 32.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Balnarring    0.0  0.0 4.9  0.0 0.0 1.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 16.5 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Bittern       0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 2.3  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  5.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Bailieston    0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Donna Buang   0.7  0.0 0.0  0.0 2.2 2.2  0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.7 4.4 0.0
Upper Yarra   0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.9 2.3  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.7  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6
Gembrook      0.0  0.0 0.8  2.4 1.9 2.8  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Arcadia       0.0  2.5 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.6  0.0 2.5 0.0 1.4 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1
Undera        0.0  0.0 0.5  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 3.2 1.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1
Coomboona     0.0  0.6 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 2.6 5.9 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.2
Toolamba      0.0  3.3 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 2.0 0.0 6.6 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0
Rushworth     0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 1.1  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sayers        0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Waranga       0.0  4.8 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 2.4 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 4.8  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.4
Costerfield   0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 1.6  0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 3.3  0.0 0.6  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Tallarook     0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 2.9  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7
               RSL PDOV CRP  JW BCHE RCR GBB RRP LLOR YTHE  RF SHBC AZKF SFC YRTH ROSE BCOO LFC  WG
Reedy Lake     6.7  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 4.8  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Pearcedale     0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Warneet        0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  1.4  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 1.8 0.0
Cranbourne     0.8  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Lysterfield    0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.7  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Red Hill       0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 1.4  0.0  0.0 3.4  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Devilbend      0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 2.4 0.0
Olinda         0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 1.9  2.0  0.7 1.2  0.0  0.6  0.0 0.0 0.0
Fern Tree Gum  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.6 0.0  0.0  0.0 3.2  1.3  0.0 1.9  0.0  0.0  0.6 0.0 0.0
Sherwin        0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.6  0.0 1.2  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Heathcote Ju   0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  1.5  0.0 1.6  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Warburton      0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 1.8  2.1  0.0 4.1  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Millgrove      0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 1.1  0.0  0.0 7.6  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Ben Cairn      0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 4.6  1.9  0.0 2.8  0.0  1.9  2.8 0.0 0.0
Panton Gap     0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 1.8  3.7  0.0 1.8  0.0  3.1  1.2 0.0 0.0
OShannassy     0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 1.6  1.6  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.7  1.6 0.0 0.0
Ghin Ghin      0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  1.8  0.0 0.0  3.9  0.0  0.0 1.2 0.0
Minto          0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Hawke          0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
St Andrews     0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Nepean         0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 2.2  1.9  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Cape Schanck   0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 2.6  0.9  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Balnarring     0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  1.9  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Bittern        0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Bailieston     0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 3.3 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Donna Buang    0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 2.2  0.7  0.0 0.7  0.0  1.5  0.0 0.0 0.0
Upper Yarra    0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.9 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  1.6  0.0 0.8  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Gembrook       0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 2.8  1.8  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 5.5 0.0
Arcadia       11.0  3.1 1.8 1.2  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 2.5 0.0
Undera         0.0  0.0 0.0 3.8  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  5.9  0.0  0.0 0.0 3.1
Coomboona      1.1  0.0 1.1 2.8  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 1.6
Toolamba       5.0  0.4 0.0 0.0  1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Rushworth      1.4  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.9 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.5
Sayers         1.7  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Waranga        0.0  0.8 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.8 4.8 10.9  2.7 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Costerfield    0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0  0.0  6.3 0.0  1.6  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
Tallarook      0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0  1.9  0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0
              PCOO WTG NMIN NFB  DB RBEE HBC  DF PCL FLAME WWT WBWS LCOR KING
Reedy Lake     1.9 0.0  0.2 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Pearcedale     0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Warneet        0.0 0.0  5.8 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Cranbourne     0.0 0.0  3.1 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Lysterfield    0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Red Hill       0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Devilbend      0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Olinda         0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Fern Tree Gum  0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Sherwin        0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Heathcote Ju   0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Warburton      0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.8
Millgrove      0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Ben Cairn      0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Panton Gap     0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
OShannassy     0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.7
Ghin Ghin      0.0 0.8  0.0 1.8 1.2  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   2.6 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Minto          0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Hawke          0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
St Andrews     0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Nepean         0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Cape Schanck   0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Balnarring     0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   1.9 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Bittern        0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Bailieston     0.0 3.1  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Donna Buang    0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   2.9 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Upper Yarra    0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Gembrook       0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Arcadia        0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 1.4  1.4 0.0 0.0 0.0   1.8 2.1  0.0  4.8  0.0
Undera         0.0 3.1  0.0 1.5 0.0  1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   5.9 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Coomboona      0.0 1.6  5.4 0.0 1.6  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   1.7 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Toolamba       0.0 0.0  5.7 0.8 1.5  0.5 0.4 0.0 0.0   0.0 2.5  0.0  0.0  0.0
Rushworth      0.0 0.5  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Sayers         0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Waranga        0.0 0.0  1.4 2.4 0.0  0.7 0.0 2.1 0.0   0.0 0.0  1.6  0.0  0.0
Costerfield    0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  1.1 0.0 1.1 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
Tallarook      0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 0.0  0.0 0.0 3.8 0.0   0.0 0.0  0.0  0.0  0.0
  1. It is highly likely that some species will be more abundant than others - some will be very common and others will be rare. Furthermore, some sites may have similar compositions yet vastly different total abundances. There might be numereous ecological explanations for such situations, yet we are primarily interested in describing the community compositions.
    1. Calculate the means and maximums of each species
      Show code
      > apply(macnally[, c(-1, -2)], 2, mean, na.rm = TRUE)

           EYR       GF      BTH      GWH     WTTR     WEHE     WNHE      SFW     WBSW       CR       LK 
 3.71081  6.11622 14.70270  3.63784  4.50811  3.56216  9.14865  5.98919  5.06757  5.38919  2.90000 
     RWB      AUR     STTH       LR     WPHE      YTH       ER      PCU      ESP      SCR     RBFT 
 5.67297  2.17297  7.98378  3.41622  7.21351  2.82703  2.25135  0.90000  3.55946  1.08108  3.18108 
    BFCS      WAG     WWCH     NHHE       VS      CST      BTR     AMAG      SCC      RWH      WSW 
 1.31081  0.94595  2.76757  2.84595  2.04865  0.96486  1.22703  1.12973  6.51081  4.08919  1.99730 
     STP     YFHE     WHIP      GAL      FHE     BRTH      SPP      SIL      GCU     MUSK     MGLK 
 2.57838  5.12162  0.70541  1.06486  1.91351  2.33784  3.08649  3.03514  0.90270  1.51351  0.40541 
    BHHE      RFC     YTBC     LYRE      CHE      OWH      TRM       MB     STHR      LHE      FTC 
 2.40541  0.46486  0.73514  0.31351  1.15405  0.21081  0.70811  0.42973  0.15135  0.41622  1.60811 
    PINK      OBO       YR      LFB      SPW     RBTR      DWS     BELL      LWB      CBW      GGC 
 0.10811  0.45135  0.15676  0.48108  0.19730  0.13514  0.51622  1.00270  1.58108  0.13243  0.33243 
     PIL      SKF      RSL     PDOV      CRP       JW     BCHE      RCR      GBB      RRP     LLOR 
 0.35676  0.58919  0.74865  0.11622  0.07838  0.21081  0.03243  0.14054  0.09459  0.25946  0.29459 
    YTHE       RF     SHBC     AZKF      SFC     YRTH     ROSE     BCOO      LFC       WG     PCOO 
 0.24324  0.73514  0.83514  0.01892  0.73243  0.26486  0.21081  0.16757  0.36216  0.14054  0.05135 
     WTG     NMIN      NFB       DB     RBEE      HBC       DF      PCL    FLAME      WWT     WBWS 
 0.24595  0.58378  0.17568  0.15405  0.12703  0.02432  0.18919  0.24595  0.45405  0.12432  0.04324 
    LCOR     KING 
 0.12973  0.04054 

      > apply(macnally[, c(-1, -2)], 2, max)

        EYR    GF   BTH   GWH  WTTR  WEHE  WNHE   SFW  WBSW    CR    LK   RWB   AUR  STTH    LR  WPHE 
  9.7  13.3  36.1   9.5  12.8  11.5  38.9  22.0  12.6  19.1   6.7  26.3   8.8  25.2  16.5  27.7 
  YTH    ER   PCU   ESP   SCR  RBFT  BFCS   WAG  WWCH  NHHE    VS   CST   BTR  AMAG   SCC   RWH 
 20.2   9.1   3.7  26.6   6.2  44.7   6.9   6.3  11.7  33.3  10.1   4.6  12.5   8.6  80.5  10.9 
  WSW   STP  YFHE  WHIP   GAL   FHE  BRTH   SPP   SIL   GCU  MUSK  MGLK  BHHE   RFC  YTBC  LYRE 
 24.3   8.7  26.7   3.8   8.6  26.2  30.6   8.3  17.5   5.7  20.0   3.7  14.1   4.3   5.5   3.0 
  CHE   OWH   TRM    MB  STHR   LHE   FTC  PINK   OBO    YR   LFB   SPW  RBTR   DWS  BELL   LWB 
 11.2   3.7  15.0   4.9   2.4   4.1   5.4   2.2   3.3   3.2   6.6   3.3   1.7   5.5  22.1  32.2 
  CBW   GGC   PIL   SKF   RSL  PDOV   CRP    JW  BCHE   RCR   GBB   RRP  LLOR  YTHE    RF  SHBC 
  1.7   4.8   4.4   2.3  11.0   3.1   1.8   3.8   1.2   3.3   0.9   4.8  10.9   6.3   4.6   3.7 
 AZKF   SFC  YRTH  ROSE  BCOO   LFC    WG  PCOO   WTG  NMIN   NFB    DB  RBEE   HBC    DF   PCL 
  0.7   7.6   5.9   3.1   2.8   5.5   3.1   1.9   3.1   5.8   2.4   1.6   1.4   0.5   3.8   9.1 
FLAME   WWT  WBWS  LCOR  KING 
  5.9   2.5   1.6   4.8   0.8 

      > apply(macnally[, c(-1, -2)], 2, sum)

        EYR    GF   BTH   GWH  WTTR  WEHE  WNHE   SFW  WBSW    CR    LK   RWB   AUR  STTH    LR  WPHE 
137.3 226.3 544.0 134.6 166.8 131.8 338.5 221.6 187.5 199.4 107.3 209.9  80.4 295.4 126.4 266.9 
  YTH    ER   PCU   ESP   SCR  RBFT  BFCS   WAG  WWCH  NHHE    VS   CST   BTR  AMAG   SCC   RWH 
104.6  83.3  33.3 131.7  40.0 117.7  48.5  35.0 102.4 105.3  75.8  35.7  45.4  41.8 240.9 151.3 
  WSW   STP  YFHE  WHIP   GAL   FHE  BRTH   SPP   SIL   GCU  MUSK  MGLK  BHHE   RFC  YTBC  LYRE 
 73.9  95.4 189.5  26.1  39.4  70.8  86.5 114.2 112.3  33.4  56.0  15.0  89.0  17.2  27.2  11.6 
  CHE   OWH   TRM    MB  STHR   LHE   FTC  PINK   OBO    YR   LFB   SPW  RBTR   DWS  BELL   LWB 
 42.7   7.8  26.2  15.9   5.6  15.4  59.5   4.0  16.7   5.8  17.8   7.3   5.0  19.1  37.1  58.5 
  CBW   GGC   PIL   SKF   RSL  PDOV   CRP    JW  BCHE   RCR   GBB   RRP  LLOR  YTHE    RF  SHBC 
  4.9  12.3  13.2  21.8  27.7   4.3   2.9   7.8   1.2   5.2   3.5   9.6  10.9   9.0  27.2  30.9 
 AZKF   SFC  YRTH  ROSE  BCOO   LFC    WG  PCOO   WTG  NMIN   NFB    DB  RBEE   HBC    DF   PCL 
  0.7  27.1   9.8   7.8   6.2  13.4   5.2   1.9   9.1  21.6   6.5   5.7   4.7   0.9   7.0   9.1 
FLAME   WWT  WBWS  LCOR  KING 
 16.8   4.6   1.6   4.8   1.5 

      > apply(macnally[, c(-1, -2)], 2, var, na.rm = TRUE)

            EYR        GF       BTH       GWH      WTTR      WEHE      WNHE       SFW      WBSW        CR 
  7.71988  17.85306 124.66083   7.38686  10.16465  10.08520  74.11923  25.76432  17.33892  29.98488 
       LK       RWB       AUR      STTH        LR      WPHE       YTH        ER       PCU       ESP 
  2.40556  53.48480   3.45592  42.44806  16.91695 114.58953  27.02036   5.44090   1.62944  22.94581 
      SCR      RBFT      BFCS       WAG      WWCH      NHHE        VS       CST       BTR      AMAG 
  3.53102  58.37213   1.72766   2.73811  15.70670  56.29366   7.71590   1.53734   8.01592   5.89381 
      SCC       RWH       WSW       STP      YFHE      WHIP       GAL       FHE      BRTH       SPP 
277.33266  10.75321  22.84805   6.97841  43.93785   1.79219   5.68068  31.27842  36.39131   4.84565 
      SIL       GCU      MUSK      MGLK      BHHE       RFC      YTBC      LYRE       CHE       OWH 
 16.06790   1.95360  21.30287   0.83775  14.60164   1.12012   2.00623   0.54731   6.75089   0.57599 
      TRM        MB      STHR       LHE       FTC      PINK       OBO        YR       LFB       SPW 
  6.86077   1.14437   0.23590   0.91862   2.03021   0.16799   0.74646   0.44697   2.25491   0.52971 
     RBTR       DWS      BELL       LWB       CBW       GGC       PIL       SKF       RSL      PDOV 
  0.17623   1.70973  18.78360  35.17324   0.17114   1.05725   0.90974   0.78488   4.91257   0.27529 
      CRP        JW      BCHE       RCR       GBB       RRP      LLOR      YTHE        RF      SHBC 
  0.11730   0.61321   0.03892   0.31859   0.06164   1.21081   3.21108   1.24419   1.43068   0.91512 
     AZKF       SFC      YRTH      ROSE      BCOO       LFC        WG      PCOO       WTG      NMIN 
  0.01324   2.43170   1.31734   0.40766   0.31003   1.16908   0.32470   0.09757   0.56755   2.61917 
      NFB        DB      RBEE       HBC        DF       PCL     FLAME       WWT      WBWS      LCOR 
  0.29856   0.20366   0.11980   0.01078   0.52044   2.23811   1.44700   0.28023   0.06919   0.62270 
     KING 
  0.02970

      2. The nature of mathematics is that large numbers yield larger and more disparate values than smaller values. Hence in order to describe the communities in a way that all species and sites have an equal opportunity to influence the patterns, we should first standardize the species abundances.

      There are a number of valid standardizations that we could attempt (and indeed you are encouraged to try a couple of alternatives to the one we use here). One popular and suitable standardization for ecological species abundance data is the Wisconsin double standardization. Not only does this standardization help suppress the dominance of the overly abundant species, it also magnifies the main patterns thereby making them easier to detect.

    2. Perform this standardization on the bird abundance data and confirm that this has evened out the abundances
      Show code
      > library(vegan)
> macnally.std <- wisconsin(macnally[, c(-1, -2)])
> apply(macnally.std[, c(-1, -2)], 2, max)

          BTH     GWH    WTTR    WEHE    WNHE     SFW    WBSW      CR      LK     RWB     AUR    STTH 
0.06781 0.07385 0.08452 0.07973 0.05925 0.07502 0.14357 0.07300 0.09260 0.08625 0.07300 0.06173 
     LR    WPHE     YTH      ER     PCU     ESP     SCR    RBFT    BFCS     WAG    WWCH    NHHE 
0.08024 0.14305 0.10025 0.08024 0.06672 0.04966 0.07914 0.05685 0.05846 0.07973 0.08486 0.09702 
     VS     CST     BTR    AMAG     SCC     RWH     WSW     STP    YFHE    WHIP     GAL     FHE 
0.08024 0.08412 0.06491 0.06491 0.05302 0.07101 0.08459 0.06218 0.05823 0.07076 0.05855 0.06491 
   BRTH     SPP     SIL     GCU    MUSK    MGLK    BHHE     RFC    YTBC    LYRE     CHE     OWH 
0.06817 0.06885 0.05302 0.05610 0.06900 0.04788 0.07914 0.04788 0.04966 0.07267 0.04966 0.04963 
    TRM      MB    STHR     LHE     FTC    PINK     OBO      YR     LFB     SPW    RBTR     DWS 
0.06491 0.08024 0.04966 0.04963 0.06217 0.06217 0.07914 0.05855 0.06309 0.06011 0.10713 0.09126 
   BELL     LWB     CBW     GGC     PIL     SKF     RSL    PDOV     CRP      JW    BCHE     RCR 
0.07300 0.09702 0.09435 0.05566 0.07267 0.08512 0.04788 0.04788 0.04788 0.05855 0.06309 0.07914 
    GBB     RRP    LLOR    YTHE      RF    SHBC    AZKF     SFC    YRTH    ROSE    BCOO     LFC 
0.08452 0.06491 0.04603 0.06011 0.05484 0.05566 0.08505 0.06123 0.05855 0.05566 0.04963 0.04966 
     WG    PCOO     WTG    NMIN     NFB      DB    RBEE     HBC      DF     PCL   FLAME     WWT 
0.05855 0.06491 0.07914 0.08459 0.04603 0.05915 0.04788 0.08625 0.06817 0.06491 0.05855 0.06309 
   WBWS    LCOR    KING 
0.04603 0.04788 0.05440 

      > apply(macnally.std[, c(-1, -2)], 2, var, na.rm = TRUE)

            BTH       GWH      WTTR      WEHE      WNHE       SFW      WBSW        CR        LK       RWB 
4.704e-04 3.970e-04 3.743e-04 5.246e-04 2.256e-04 3.121e-04 1.070e-03 3.795e-04 3.270e-04 5.362e-04 
      AUR      STTH        LR      WPHE       YTH        ER       PCU       ESP       SCR      RBFT 
2.258e-04 3.030e-04 3.448e-04 1.088e-03 4.462e-04 4.023e-04 5.698e-04 1.020e-04 4.593e-04 9.532e-05 
     BFCS       WAG      WWCH      NHHE        VS       CST       BTR      AMAG       SCC       RWH 
1.590e-04 4.435e-04 6.529e-04 4.579e-04 4.017e-04 3.738e-04 1.879e-04 2.768e-04 1.293e-04 4.836e-04 
      WSW       STP      YFHE      WHIP       GAL       FHE      BRTH       SPP       SIL       GCU 
2.857e-04 3.781e-04 2.499e-04 4.947e-04 2.709e-04 1.819e-04 2.000e-04 3.802e-04 1.871e-04 2.461e-04 
     MUSK      MGLK      BHHE       RFC      YTBC      LYRE       CHE       OWH       TRM        MB 
2.261e-04 2.003e-04 4.002e-04 1.642e-04 2.324e-04 3.176e-04 2.172e-04 1.111e-04 1.222e-04 3.187e-04 
     STHR       LHE       FTC      PINK       OBO        YR       LFB       SPW      RBTR       DWS 
1.197e-04 1.715e-04 3.327e-04 1.348e-04 3.043e-04 1.495e-04 1.942e-04 2.064e-04 5.152e-04 3.397e-04 
     BELL       LWB       CBW       GGC       PIL       SKF       RSL      PDOV       CRP        JW 
1.934e-04 2.976e-04 4.610e-04 1.362e-04 2.051e-04 6.308e-04 1.241e-04 6.597e-05 9.389e-05 1.429e-04 
     BCHE       RCR       GBB       RRP      LLOR      YTHE        RF      SHBC      AZKF       SFC 
1.076e-04 1.860e-04 4.313e-04 1.666e-04 5.725e-05 1.064e-04 3.168e-04 3.014e-04 1.955e-04 1.755e-04 
     YRTH      ROSE      BCOO       LFC        WG      PCOO       WTG      NMIN       NFB        DB 
1.275e-04 1.418e-04 1.150e-04 1.282e-04 1.180e-04 1.139e-04 2.769e-04 4.055e-04 1.428e-04 2.607e-04 
     RBEE       HBC        DF       PCL     FLAME       WWT      WBWS      LCOR      KING 
1.780e-04 2.634e-04 1.462e-04 1.139e-04 1.570e-04 1.475e-04 5.725e-05 6.195e-05 1.443e-04
    3. We now need to generate a distance matrix reflecting the multidimensional distance between each of the site pairs. The Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index is a very popular distance metric as it:
      • Reaches a maximum of 1 when two sites have nothing in common
      • Reaches a minimum of 0 when two sites are identical
      • Ignores shared absences, so dissimilarity is based only on the values of characteristics that the objects do share - two sites are not considered similar just because they both do not contain a certain species.
      Calculated the Bray-Curtis(Czekanowski) dissimilarity coefficients amongst the sites using all 102 standardized bird species abundances.
      Show code
      > macnally.dist <- vegdist(macnally.std, "bray")
    4. Perform a non-metric multidimensional scaling with:
      • two dimensions ($k=2$)
      • use principle coordinates analysis to create the initial configuration
      • use a maximum of 20 random starts
      • use (modified) Kruskal's stress to determine the match between ordination distances and ecological distances
      • use procrustes rotation to determine whether the configurations have converged
      • center the axes scores and rotate the points such that the greatest plane of variation is orientated with the primary axis
      Show code
      > macnally.mds <- metaMDS(macnally.dist, k = 2)

      Run 0 stress 0.1239 
Run 1 stress 0.1239 
... New best solution
... procrustes: rmse 0.003365  max resid 0.01766 
Run 2 stress 0.1716 
Run 3 stress 0.1368 
Run 4 stress 0.1368 
Run 5 stress 0.1862 
Run 6 stress 0.1239 
... procrustes: rmse 0.0003442  max resid 0.001192 
*** Solution reached
      1. What is the final stress value?
        Show code
        > macnally.mds$stress

        [1] 0.1239
      2. What does this stress value suggest about the success of the MDS, are two dimensions adequate?
      3. The Sheppard diagram (stress plot) represents the relationship between the ecological distances (y-axis) and the new MDS ordination distances (x-axis). How would you describe the shape of this curve, and base on this is metric or non-metric MDS more appropriate?
        Show code
        > stressplot(macnally.mds)
        plot of chunk ws15.1Q2.3c
    5. Generate an ordination plot to represent the similarity of the bird communities of the sites graphically.
      Show code
      > ordiplot(macnally.mds, display = "sites", type = "n")
> text(macnally.mds, lab = rownames(macnally), col = as.numeric(macnally$HABITAT))
> habitat <- model.matrix(~-1 + macnally$HABITAT)
> colnames(habitat) <- gsub("macnally\\$HABITAT", "", colnames(habitat))
> envfit <- envfit(macnally.mds, env = habitat)
> envfit

      ***VECTORS

                     NMDS1   NMDS2   r2 Pr(>r)    
Box-Ironbark       -0.0395  0.9992 0.35  0.002 ** 
Foothills Woodland  0.2828  0.9592 0.04  0.496    
Gipps.Manna        -0.1333 -0.9911 0.41  0.001 ***
Mixed               0.5517 -0.8341 0.17  0.037 *  
Montane Forest      0.8796  0.4756 0.10  0.149    
River Red Gum      -0.9036  0.4284 0.53  0.001 ***
---
Signif. codes:  0 '***' 0.001 '**' 0.01 '*' 0.05 '.' 0.1 ' ' 1 
P values based on 999 permutations.

      > plot(envfit, col = "gray")
      plot of chunk ws15.1Q2.4a

  Quitting R

There are two ways to quit R elegantly
  1. Goto the RGui File menu and select Quit
  2. In the R Console, type 
    > q()
Either way you will be prompted to save the workspace, generally this is not necessary or even desirable.

End of instructions

  The R working directory

The R working directory is the location that R looks in to read/write files. When you load R, it initially sets the working directory to a location within the R subdirectory of your computer (Windows and MacOSX) or the location from which you executed R (Linux). However, we can alter the working directory so that it points to another location. This not only prevents having to search for files, it also negates the need to specify a path as well as a filename in various operations.
The working directory can be altered by specifying a path (full or relative) as an argument to the setwd() function. Note that R uses Unix path slashes ("/") irrespective of what operating system. 
> setwd("/Work/Analyses/Project1")  #change the working directory

Alternatively, on Windows:
  1. Goto the RGui File menu
  2. Select the Change dir submenu
  3. Locate the directory that contains your data and/or scripts
  4. Click OK

End of instructions

  Read in (source) an R script

There are two ways to read in (source) a R script
  1. Goto the RGui File menu and select Source R code
  2. In the R Console, type

    > source('filename')

    where 'filename' is the name of the R script file.
All commands in the file will be executed sequentially starting at the first line. Note that R will ignore everything that is on a line following the '#' character. This provides a way of inserting comments into script files (a practice that is highly encouraged as it provides a way of reminding yourself what each line of syntax does).

Note that there is an alternative way of using scripts

  1. Goto the RGui File menu and select the Open script submenu
    2. This will display the R script file in the R Editor window
  2. Syntax can then be directly cut and paste into the R Console. Again,each line will be executed sequentially and comments are ignored.
When working with multi-step analyses, it is recommended that you have the R Editor open and that syntax is entered directly into the editor and then pasted into the R Console. Then provided the R script is saved regularly, your data and analyses are safe from computer disruptions.

End of instructions

  R workspace

The R workspace stores all the objects that are created during an R session. To view a list of objects occupying the current R workshpace

> ls()

The workspace is cabable of storing huge numbers of objects, and thus it can become cluttered (with objects that you have created, but forgotten about, or many similar objects that contain similar contents) very rapidly. Whilst this does not affect the performance of R, it can lead to chronic confusion. It is advisable that you remove all unwanted objects when you have finished with them. To remove and object;

> rm(object name)

where object name is the name of the object to be removed.

When you exit R, you will be prompted for whether you want to save the workspace. You can also save the current workspace at any time by; A saved workspace is not in easily readable text format. Saving a workspace enables you to retrieve an entire sessions work instantly, which can be useful if you are forced to perform you analyses over multiple sittings. Furthermore, by providing different names, it is possible to maintain different workspaces for different projects.

End of instructions

  Removing objects

To remove an object

> rm(object name)

where object name is the name of the object to be removed.

End of instructions

  R indexing

A vector is simply a array (list) of entries of the same type. For example, a numeric vector is just a list of numbers. A vector has only a single dimension - length - and thus the first entry in the vector has an index of 1 (is in position 1), the second has an index of 2 (position 2), etc. The index of an entry provides a convenient way to access entries. If a vector contained the numbers 10, 5, 8, 3.1, then the entry with index 1 is 10, at index 4 is the entry 3.1. Consider the following examples 
> var <- c(4, 8, 2, 6, 9, 2)
> var

[1] 4 8 2 6 9 2

> var[5]

[1] 9

> var[3:5]

[1] 2 6 9

A data frame on the other hand is not a single vector, but rather a collection of vectors. It is a matrix, consisting of columns and rows and therefore has both length and width. Consequently, each entry has a row index and a column index. Consider the following examples 
> dv <- c(4, 8, 2, 6, 9, 2)
> iv <- c("a", "a", "a", "b", "b", "b")
> data <- data.frame(iv, dv)
> data

  iv dv
1  a  4
2  a  8
3  a  2
4  b  6
5  b  9
6  b  2

> # The first column (preserve frame)
> data[1]

  iv
1  a
2  a
3  a
4  b
5  b
6  b

> # The second column (preserve frame)
> data[2]

  dv
1  4
2  8
3  2
4  6
5  9
6  2

> # The first column (as vector)
> data[, 1]

[1] a a a b b b
Levels: a b

> # The first row (as vector)
> data[1, ]

  iv dv
1  a  4

> # list the entry in row 3, column 2
> data[3, 2]

[1] 2

End of instructions

  R 'fix()' function

The 'fix()' function provides a very rudimentary spreadsheet for data editing and entry.

> fix(data frame name)

The spreadsheet (Data Editor) will appear. A new variable can be created by clicking on a column heading and then providing a name fo r the variable as well as an indication of whether the contents are expected to be numeric (numbers) or character (contain some letters). Data are added by clicking on a cell and providing an entry. Closing the Data Editor will cause the changes to come into affect.

End of instructions

  R transformations

The following table illustrates the use of common data transmformation functions on a single numeric vector (old_var). In each case a new vector is created (new_var)

TransformationSyntax
loge

> new_var <- log(old_var)

log10

> new_var <- log10(old_var)

square root

> new_var <- sqrt(old_var)

arcsin

> new_var <- asin(sqrt(old_var))

scale (mean=0, unit variance)

> new_var <- scale(old_var)

where old_var is the name of the original variable that requires transformation and new_var is the name of the new variable (vector) that is to contain the transformed data. Note that the original vector (variable) is not altered.

End of instructions

  Data transformations


Essentially transforming data is the process of converting the scale in which the observations were measured into another scale.

I will demonstrate the principles of data transformation with two simple examples.
Firstly, to illustrate the legality and frequency of data transformations, imagine you had measured water temperature in a large number of streams. Naturally, you would have probably measured the temperature in ° C. Supposing you later wanted to publish your results in an American journal and the editor requested that the results be in ° F. You would not need to re-measure the stream temperature. Rather, each of the temperatures could be converted from one scale (° C) to the other (° F). Such transformations are very common.

To further illustrate the process of transformation, imagine a botanist wanted to examine the size of a particular species leaves for some reason. The botanist decides to measure the length of a random selection of leaves using a standard linear, metric ruler and the distribution of sample observations as represented by a histogram and boxplot are as follows.


The growth rate of leaves might be expected to be greatest in small leaves and decelerate with increasing leaf size. That is, the growth rate of leaves might be expected to be logarithmic rather than linear. As a result, the distribution of leaf sizes using a linear scale might also be expected to be non-normal (log-normal). If, instead of using a linear scale, the botanist had used a logarithmic ruler, the distribution of leaf sizes may have been more like the following.


If the distribution of observations is determined by the scale used to measure of the observations, and the choice of scale (in this case the ruler) is somewhat arbitrary (a linear scale is commonly used because we find it easier to understand), then it is justifiable to convert the data from one scale to another after the data has been collected and explored. It is not necessary to re-measure the data in a different scale. Therefore to normalize the data, the botanist can simply convert the data to logarithms.

The important points in the process of transformations are;
  1. The order of the data has not been altered (a large leaf measured on a linear scale is still a large leaf on a logarithmic scale), only the spacing of the data
  2. Since the spacing of the data is purely dependent on the scale of the measuring device, there is no reason why one scale is more correct than any other scale
  3. For the purpose of normalization, data can be converted from one scale to another following exploration

End of instructions

  R writing data

To export data into R, we read the empty the contents a data frame into a file. The general format of the command for writing data in from a data frame into a file is

> write.data(data frame name, 'filename.csv', quote=F, sep=',')

where data frame name is a name of the data frame to be saved and filename.csv is the name of the csv file that is to be created (or overwritten). The argument quote=F indicates that quotation marks should not be placed around entries in the file. The argument sep=',' indicates that entries in the file are separated by a comma (hence a comma delimited file).

As an example

> write.data(LEAVES, 'leaves.csv', quote=F, sep=',')

End of instructions

  Exporting from Excel

End of instructions

  Reading data into R

Ensure that the working directory is pointing to the path containing the file to be imported before proceeding.
To import data into R, we read the contents of a file into a data frame. The general format of the command for reading data into a data frame is

> name <- read.table('filename.csv', header=T, sep=',', row.names=column, strip.white=T)

where name is a name you wish the data frame to be referred to as, filename.csv is the name of the csv file that you created in excel and column is the number of the column that had row labels (if there were any). The argument header=T indicates that the variable (vector) names will be created from the names supplied in the first row of the file. The argument sep=',' indicates that entries in the file are separated by a comma (hence a comma delimited file). If the data file does not contain row labels, or you are not sure whether it does, it is best to omit the row.names=column argument. The strip.white=T arguement ensures that no leading or trailing spaces are left in character names (these can be particularly nasty in categorical variables!).

As an example 
> phasmid <- read.data("phasmid.csv", header = T, sep = ",", row.names = 1, strip.white = T)

End of instructions

  Cutting and pasting data into R

To import data into R via the clipboard, copy the data in Excel (including a row containing column headings - variable names) to the clipboard (CNTRL-C). Then in R use a modification of the read.table function:

> name <- read.table('clipboard', header=T, sep='\t', row.names=column, strip.white=T)

where name is a name you wish the data frame to be referred to as, clipboard is used to indicate that the data are on the clipboard, and column is the number of the column that had row labels (if there were any). The argument header=T indicates that the variable (vector) names will be created from the names supplied in the first row of the file. The argument sep='\t' indicates that entries in the clipboard are separated by a TAB. If the data file does not contain row labels, or you are not sure whether it does, it is best to omit the row.names=column argument. The strip.white=T arguement ensures that no leading or trailing spaces are left in character names (these can be particularly nasty in categorical variables!).

As an example 
> phasmid <- read.data("clipboard", header = T, sep = "\t", row.names = 1, strip.white = T)

End of instructions

  Writing a copy of the data to an R script file

> phasmid <- dump('data', "")

where 'data' is the name of the object that you wish to be stored.
Cut and paste the output of this command directly into the top of your R script. In future, when the script file is read, it will include a copy of your data set, preserved exactly.

End of instructions

  Frequency histogram

> hist(variable)

where variable is the name of the numeric vector (variable) for which the histogram is to be constructed.

End of instructions

  Summary Statistics

# mean
> mean(variable)
# variance
> var(variable)
# standard deviation
> sd(variable)
# variable length
> length(variable)
# median
> median(variable)
# maximum
> max(variable)
# minimum
> min(variable)
# standard error of mean
> sd(variable)/sqrt(length(variable))
# interquartile range
> quantile(variable, c(.25,.75))
# 95% confidence interval
> qnorm(0.975,0,1)*(sd(variable)/sqrt(length(variable)))

where variable is the name of the numeric vector (variable).

End of instructions

  Normal probabilities

> pnorm(c(value), mean=mean, sd=sd, lower.tail=FALSE)

this will calculate the area under a normal distribution (beyond the value of value) with mean of mean and standard deviation of sd. The argument lower.tail=FALSE indicates that the area is calculated for values greater than value. For example

> pnorm(c(2.9), mean=2.025882, sd=0.4836265, lower.tail=FALSE)

End of instructions

  Boxplots

A boxplot is a graphical representation of the distribution of observations based on the 5-number summary that includes the median (50%), quartiles (25% and 75%) and data range (0% - smallest observation and 100% - largest observation). The box demonstrates where the middle 50% of the data fall and the whiskers represent the minimum and maximum observations. Outliers (extreme observations) are also represented when present.
The figure below demonstrates the relationship between the distribution of observations and a boxplot of the same observations. Normally distributed data results in symmetrical boxplots, whereas skewed distributions result in asymmetrical boxplots with each segment getting progressively larger (or smaller).

End of instructions

  Boxplots

> boxplot(variable)

where variable is the name of the numeric vector (variable)

End of instructions

  Observations, variables & populations

Observations are the sampling units (e.g quadrats) or experimental units (e.g. individual organisms, aquaria) that make up the sample.

Variables are the actual properties measured by the individual observations (e.g. length, number of individuals, rate, pH, etc). Random variables (those variables whose values are not known for sure before the onset of sampling) can be either continuous (can theoretically be any value within a range, e.g. length, weight, pH, etc) or categorical (can only take on certain discrete values, such as counts - number of organisms etc).

Populations are defined as all the possible observations that we are interested in.

A sample represents a collected subset of the population's observations and is used to represent the entire population. Sample statistics are the characteristics of the sample (e.g. sample mean) and are used to estimate population parameters.

End of instructions

  Population & sample

A population refers to all possible observations. Therefore, population parameters refer to the characteristics of the whole population. For example the population mean.

A sample represents a collected subset of the population's observations and is used to represent the entire population. Sample statistics are the characteristics of the sample (e.g. sample mean) and are used to estimate population parameters.

End of instructions

  Standard error and precision

A good indication of how good a single estimate is likely to be is how precise the measure is. Precision is a measure of how repeatable an outcome is. If we could repeat the sampling regime multiple times and each time calculate the sample mean, then we could examine how similar each of the sample means are. So a measure of precision is the degree of variability between the individual sample means from repeated sampling events.

Sample number Sample mean
112.1
212.7
312.5
Mean of sample means12.433
> SD of sample means0.306

The table above lists three sample means and also illustrates a number of important points;
  1. Each sample yields a different sample mean
  2. The mean of the sample means should be the best estimate of the true population mean
  3. The more similar (consistent) the sample means are, the more precise any single estimate of the population mean is likely to be
The standard deviation of the sample means from repeated sampling is called the Standard error of the mean.

It is impractical to repeat the sampling effort multiple times, however, it is possible to estimate the standard error (and therefore the precision of any individual sample mean) using the standard deviation (SD) of a single sample and the size (n) of this single sample.

The smaller the standard error (SE) of the mean, the more precise (and possibly more reliable) the estimate of the mean is likely to be.

End of instructions

  Confidence intervals


A 95% confidence interval is an interval that we are 95% confident will contain the true population mean. It is the interval that there is a less than 5% chance that this interval will not contain the true population mean, and therefore it is very unlikely that this interval will not contain the true mean. The frequentist approach to statistics dictates that if multiple samples are collected from a population and the interval is calculated for each sample, 95% of these intervals will contain the true population mean and 5% will not. Therefore there is a 95% probability that any single sample interval will contain the population mean.

The interval is expressed as the mean ± half the interval. The confidence interval is obviously affected by the degree of confidence. In order to have a higher degree of confidence that an interval is likely to contain the population mean, the interval would need to be larger.

End of instructions

  Successful transformations


Since the objective of a transformation is primarily to normalize the data (although variance homogeneity and linearization may also be beneficial side-effects) the success of a transformation is measured by whether or not it has improved the normality of the data. It is not measured by whether the outcome of a statistical analysis is more favorable!

End of instructions

  Selecting subsets of data

# select the first 5 entries in the variable
> variable[1:5]
# select all but the first entry in the variable
> variable[-1]
# select all cases of variable that are less than num
> variable[variablenum]
# select all cases of variable that are equal to 'Big'
> variable1[variablelabel]

where variable is the name of a numeric vector (variable) and num is a number. variable1 is the name of a character vector and label is a character string (word). 5. In the Subset expression box enter a logical statement that indicates how the data is to be subsetted. For example, exclude all values of DOC that are greater than 170 (to exclude the outlier) and therefore only include those values that are less that 170, enter DOC < 170. Alternatively, you could chose to exclude the outlier using its STREAM name. To exclude this point enter STREAM. != 'Santa Cruz'.

End of instructions

  Summary Statistics by groups

> tapply(dv,factor,func)

the tapply() function applies the function func to the numeric vector dv for each level of the factor factor. For example

# calculate the mean separately for each group
> tapply(dv,factor,mean)
# calculate the mean separately for each group
> tapply(dv,factor,var)

End of instructions

  EDA - Normal distribution

Parametric statistical hypothesis tests assume that the population measurements follow a specific distribution. Most commonly, statistical hypothesis tests assume that the population measurements are normally distributed (Question 4 highlights the specific reasoning for this).

While it is usually not possible to directly examine the distribution of measurements in the whole population to determine whether or not this requirement is satisfied or not (for the same reasons that it is not possible to directly measure population parameters such as population mean), if the sampling is adequate (unbiased and sufficiently replicated), the distribution of measurements in a sample should reflect the population distribution. That is a sample of measurements taken from a normally distributed population should be normally distributed.

Tests on data that do not meet the distributional requirements may not be reliable, and thus, it is essential that the distribution of data be examined routinely prior to any formal statistical analysis.

End of instructions

  Factorial boxplots

> boxplot(dv~factor,data=data)

where dv is the name of the numeric vector (dependent variable), factor is the name of the factor (categorical or factor variable) and data is the name of the data frame (data set). The '~' is used in formulas to represent that the left hand side is proportional to the right hand side.

End of instructions

  EDA - Linearity

The most common methods for analysing the relationship or association between variables.assume that the variables are linearly related (or more correctly, that they do not covary according to some function other than linear). For example, to examine for the presence and strength of the relationship between two variables (such as those depicted below), it is a requirement of the more basic statistical tests that the variables not be related by any function other than a linear (straight line) function if any function at all.

There is no evidence that the data represented in Figure (a) are related (covary) according to any function other than linear. Likewise, there is no evidence that the data represented in Figure (b) are related (covary) according to any function other than linear (if at all). However, there is strong evidence that the data represented in Figure (c) are not related linearly. Hence Figure (c) depicts evidence for a violation in the statistical necessity of linearity.

End of instructions

  EDA - Scatterplots

Scatterplots are constructed to present the relationships, associations and trends between continuous variables. By convention, dependent variables are arranged on the Y-axis and independent variables on the X-axis. The variable measurements are used as coordinates and each replicate is represented by a single point.

Figure (c) above displays a linear smoother (linear `line-of-best-fit') through the data. Different smoothers help identify different trends in data.

End of instructions

  Scatterplots

# load the 'car' library
> library(car)
# generate a scatterplot
> scatterplot(dv~iv,data=data)

where dv is the dependent variable, iv is the independent variable and data is the data frame (data set).

End of instructions

  Plotting y against x


The statement 'plot variable1 against variable2' is interpreted as 'plot y against x'. That is variable1 is considered to be the dependent variable and is plotted on the y-axis and variable2 is the independent variable and thus is plotted on the x-axis.

End of instructions

  Scatterplot matrix (SPLOM)

# make sure the car package is loaded > library(car)
> scatterplot.matrix(~var1 + var2 + var3, data=data, diagonal='boxplot')
#OR > pairs(~var1 + var2 + var3, data=data)

where var1, var2 etc are the names of numeric vectors in the data data frame (data set)

End of instructions

  EDA - Homogeneity of variance

Many statistical hypothesis tests assume that the populations from which the sample measurements were collected are equally varied with respect to all possible measurements. For example, are the growth rates of one population of plants (the population treated with a fertilizer) more or less varied than the growth rates of another population (the control population that is purely treated with water). If they are, then the results of many statistical hypothesis tests that compare means may be unreliable. If the populations are equally varied, then the tests are more likely to be reliable.
Obviously, it is not possible to determine the variability of entire populations. However, if sampling is unbiased and sufficiently replicated, then the variability of samples should be directly proportional to the variability of their respective populations. Consequently, samples that have substantially different degrees of variability provide strong evidence that the populations are likely to be unequally varied.
There are a number of options available to determine the likelihood that populations are equally varied from samples.
1. Calculate the variance or standard deviation of the populations. If one sample is more than 2 times greater or less than the other sample(s), then there is some evidence for unequal population variability (non-homogeneity of variance)
2. Construct boxplots of the measurements for each population, and compare the lengths of the boxplots. The length of a symmetrical (and thus normally distributed) boxplot is a robust measure of the spread of values, and thus an indication of the spread of population values. Therefore if any of the boxplots are more than 2 times longer or shorter than the other boxplot(s), then there is again, some evidence for unequal population variability (non-homogeneity of variance)


End of instructions

  t test

The frequentist approach to hypothesis testing is based on estimating the probability of collecting the observed sample(s) when the null hypothesis is true. That is, how rare would it be to collect samples that displayed the observed degree of difference if the samples had been collected from identical populations. The degree of difference between two collected samples is objectively represented by a t statistic.

Where y1 and y2 are the sample means of group 1 and 2 respectively and √s²/n1 + s²/n2 represents the degree of precision in the difference between means by taking into account the degree of variability of each sample.
If the null hypothesis is true (that is the mean of population 1 and population 2 are equal), the degree of difference (t value) between an unbiased sample collected from population 1 and an unbiased sample collected from population 2 should be close to zero (0). It is unlikely that an unbiased sample collected from population 1 will have a mean substantially higher or lower than an unbiased sample from population 2. That is, it is unlikely that such samples could result in a very large (positive or negative) t value if the null hypothesis (of no difference between populations) was true. The question is, how large (either positive or negative) does the t value need to be, before we conclude that the null hypothesis is unlikely to be true?.

What is needed is a method by which we can determine the likelihood of any conceivable t value when null hypothesis is true. This can be done via simulation. We can simulate the collection of random samples from two identical populations and calculate the proportion of all possible t values.

Lets say a vivoculturalist was interested in comparing the size of Eucalyptus regnans seedlings grown under shade and full sun conditions. In this case we have two populations. One population represents all the possible E. regnans seedlings grown in shade conditions, and the other population represents all the possible E. regnans seedlings grown in full sun conditions. If we had grown 200 seedlings under shade conditions and 200 seedlings under full sun conditions, then these samples can be used to assess the null hypothesis that the mean size of an infinite number (population) of E. regnans seedlings grown under shade conditions is the same as the mean size of an infinite number (population) of E. regnans seedlings grown under full sun conditions. That is that the population means are equal.

We can firstly simulate the sizes of 200 seedlings grown under shade conditions and another 200 seedlings grown under full sun conditions that could arise naturally when shading has no effect on seedling growth. That is, we can simulate one possible outcome when the null hypothesis is true and shading has no effect on seedling growth
Now we can calculate the degree of difference between the mean sizes of seedlings grown under the two different conditions taking into account natural variation (that is, we can calculate a t value using the formula from above). From this simulation we may have found that the mean size of seedling grown in shade and full sun was 31.5cm and 33.7cm respectively and the degree of difference (t value) was 0.25. This represents only one possible outcome (t value). We now repeat this simulation process a large number of times (1000) and generate a histogram (or more correctly, a distribution) of the t value outcomes that are possible when the null hypothesis is true.

It should be obvious that when the null hypothesis is true (and the two populations are the same), the majority of t values calculated from samples containing 200 seedlings will be close to zero (0) - indicating only small degrees of difference between the samples. However, it is also important to notice that it is possible (albeit less likely) to have samples that are quit different from one another (large positive or negative t values) just by pure chance (for example t values greater than 2).

It turns out that it is not necessary to perform these simulations each time you test a null hypothesis. There is a mathematical formulae to estimate the t distribution appropriate for any given sample size (or more correctly, degrees of freedom) when the null hypothesis is true. In this case, the t distribution is for (200-1)+(200-1)=398 degrees of freedom.

At this stage we would calculate the t value from our actual observed samples (the 200 real seedlings grown under each of the conditions). We then compare this t value to our distribution of all possible t values (t distribution) to determine how likely our t value is when the null hypothesis is true. The simulated t distribution suggests that very large (positive or negative) t values are unlikely. The t distribution allows us to calculate the probability of obtaining a value greater than a specific t value. For example, we could calculate the probability of obtaining a t value of 2 or greater when the null hypothesis is true, by determining the area under the t distribution beyond a value of 2.

If the calculated t value was 2, then the probability of obtaining this t value (or one greater) when the null hypothesis is true is 0.012 (or 1.2%). Since the probability of obtaining our t value or one greater (and therefore the probability of having a sample of 200 seedlings grown in the shade being so much different in size than a sample of 200 seedlings grown in full sun) is so low, we would conclude that the null hypothesis of no effect of shading on seedling growth is likely to be false. Thus, we have provided some strong evidence that shading conditions do effect seedling growth!


End of instructions

  t-test degrees of freedom

Degrees of freedom is the number of observations that are free to vary when estimating a parameter. For a t-test, df is calculated as
df = (n1-1)+(n2-1)
where n1 is population 1 sample size and n2 is the sample size of population 2.

End of instructions

  One-tailed critical t-value

One-tail critical t-values are just calculated from a t distribution (of given df). The area under the t distribution curve above (or below) this value is 0.05 (or some other specified probability). Essentially we calculate a quantile of a specified probability from a t distribution of df degrees of freedom

# calculate critical t value (&alpha =0.05) for upper tail (e.g. A larger than B)
> qt(0.05,df=df,lower.tail=F)
# calculate critical t value (&alpha =0.05) for lower tail (e.g. B larger than A)
> qt(0.05,df=df,lower.tail=T)

where 0.05 is the specified &alpha value and df is the specified degrees of freedom. Note that it is not necessary to have collected the data before calculating the critical t-value, you only need to know sample sizes (to get df).

It actually doesn't matter whether you select Lower tail is TRUE or FALSE. The t-distribution is a symmetrical distribution, centered around 0, therefore, the critical t-value is the same for both Lower tail (e.g. population 2 greater than population 1) and Upper tail (e.g. population 1 greater than population 2), except that the Lower tail is always negative. As it is often less confusing to work with positive values, it is recommended that you use Upper tail values. An example of a t-distribution with Upper tail for a one-tailed test is depicted below. Note that this is not part of the t quantiles output!


End of instructions

  Two-tailed critical t-value

Two-tail critical t-values are just calculated from a t distribution (of given df). The area under the t distribution curve above and below the positive and negative of this value respectively is 0.05 (or some other specified probability). Essentially we calculate a quantile of a specified probability from a t distribution of df degrees of freedom. In a two-tailed test, half of the probability is associated with the area above the positive critical t-value and the other half is associated with the area below the negative critical t-value. Therefore when we use the quantile to calculate this critical t-value, we specify the probability as &alpha/2 - since &alpha/2 applies to each tail.

# calculate critical t value (&alpha =0.05) for upper tail (e.g. A different to B)
> qt(0.05/2,df=df, lower.tail=T)

where 0.05 is the specified &alpha value and df is the specified degrees of freedom. Note that it is not necessary to have collected the data before calculating the critical t-value, you only need to know sample sizes (to get df).

Again, it actually doesn't matter whether you select Lower tail as either TRUE or FALSE. For a symmetrical distribution, centered around 0, the critical t-value is the same for both Lower tail (e.g. population 2 greater than population 1) and Upper tail (e.g. population 1 greater than population 2), except that the Lower tail is always negative. As it is often less confusing to work with positive values, it is recommended that you use Upper tail values. An example of a t-distribution with Upper tail for a two-tailed test is depicted below. Note that this is not part of the t quantiles output!

End of instructions

  Basic steps of Hypothesis testing


Step 1 - Clearly establish the statistical null hypothesis. Therefore, start off by considering the situation where the null hypothesis is true - e.g. when the two population means are equal

Step 2 - Establish a critical statistical criteria (e.g. alpha = 0.05)

Step 3 - Collect samples consisting of independent, unbiased samples

Step 4 - Assess the assumptions relevant to the statistical hypothesis test. For a t test:
  1.  Normality
  2.  Homogeneity of variance

Step 5 - Calculate test statistic appropriate for null hypothesis (e.g. a t value)


Step 6 - Compare observed test statistic to a probability distribution for that test statistic when the null hypothesis is true for the appropriate degrees of freedom (e.g. compare the observed t value to a t distribution).

Step 7 - If the observed test statistic is greater (in magnitude) than the critical value for that test statistic (based on the predefined critical criteria), we conclude that it is unlikely that the observed samples could have come from populations that fulfill the null hypothesis and therefore the null hypothesis is rejected, otherwise we conclude that there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Alternatively, we calculate the probability of obtaining the observed test statistic (or one of greater magnitude) when the null hypothesis is true. If this probability is less than our predefined critical criteria (e.g. 0.05), we conclude that it is unlikely that the observed samples could have come from populations that fulfill the null hypothesis and therefore the null hypothesis is rejected, otherwise we conclude that there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

End of instructions

  Pooled variance t-test

> t.test(dv~factor,data=data,var.equal=T)

where dv is the name of the dependent variable, factor is the name of the categorical/factorial variable and data is the name of the data frame (data set). The argument var.equal=T indicates a pooled variances t-test

End of instructions

  Separate variance t-test

> t.test(dv~factor,data=data,var.equal=F)

where dv is the name of the dependent variable, factor is the name of the categorical/factorial variable and data is the name of the data frame (data set). The argument var.equal=F indicates a separate variances t-test

End of instructions

  Output of t-test


The following output are based on a simulated data sets;
1.  Pooled variance t-test for populations with equal (or nearly so) variances

2.  Separate variance t-test for population with unequal variances

End of instructions

  Paired t-test

> t.test(cat1, cat2, data=data, paired=T)

where cat1 and cat2 are two numeric vectors (variables) in the data data frame (data set). The argument paired=T indicates a paired t-test)

End of instructions

  Non-parametric tests

Non-parametric tests do not place any distributional limitations on data sets and are therefore useful when the assumption of normality is violated. There are a number of alternatives to parametric tests, the most common are;

1. Randomization tests - rather than assume that a test statistic calculated from the data follows a specific mathematical distribution (such as a normal distribution), these tests generate their own test statistic distribution by repeatedly re-sampling or re-shuffling the original data and recalculating the test statistic each time. A p value is subsequently calculated as the proportion of random test statistics that are greater than or equal to the test statistic based on the original (un-shuffled) data.

2. Rank-based tests - these tests operate not on the original data, but rather data that has first been ranked (each observation is assigned a ranking, such that the largest observation is given the value of 1, the next highest is 2 and so on). It turns out that the probability distribution of any rank based test statistic for a is identical.

End of instructions

  Wilcoxon test

> wilcox.test(dv ~ factor, data=data)

where dv is the dependent variable and factor is the categorical variable from the data data frame (data set).

End of instructions

  Randomization (permutation) tests

The basis of hypothesis testing (when comparing two populations) is to determine how often we would expect to collect a specific sample (or more one more unusual) if the populations were identical. That is, would our sample be considered unusual under normal circumstances? To determine this, we need to estimate what sort of samples we would expect under normal circumstances. The theoretical t-distribution mimics what it would be like to randomly resample repeatedly (with a given sample size) from such identical populations.

A single sample from the (proposed) population(s) provides a range of observations that are possible. Completely shuffling those data (or labels), should mimic the situation when there is no effect (null hypothesis true situation), since the data are then effectively assigned randomly with respect to the effect. In the case of a t-test comparing the means of two groups, randomly shuffling the data is likely to result similar group means. This provides one possible outcome (t-value) that might be expected when the null hypothesis true. If this shuffling process is repeated multiple times, a distribution of all of the outcomes (t-values) that are possible when the null hypothesis is true can be generated. We can now determine how unusual our real (unshuffled) t-value is by comparing it to the built up t-distribution. If the real t-value is expected to occur less than 5% of the time, we reject the null hypothesis.

Randomization tests - rather than assume that a test statistic calculated from the data follows a specific mathematical distribution (such as a normal distribution), these tests generate their own test statistic distribution by repeatedly re-sampling or re-shuffling the original data and recalculating the test statistic each time. A p value is subsequently calculated as the proportion of random test statistics that are greater than or equal to the test statistic based on the original (un-shuffled) data.

End of instructions

  Defining the randomization statistic
 

> stat <- function(data, indices) {
+     t <- t.test(data[, 2] ~ data[, 1])$stat
+     t
+ }
The above function takes a data set (data) and calculates a test statistic (in this case a t-statistic). The illustrated function uses the t.test() function to perform a t-test on column 2 ([,2]) against column 1 ([,1]). The value of the t-statistic is stored in an object called 't'. The function returns the value of this object. The indentations are not important, they are purely used to improve human readability.

End of instructions

  Defining the data shuffling procedure
 

> rand.gen <- function(data, mle) {
+     out <- data
+     out[, 1] <- sample(out[, 1], replace = F)
+     out
+ }
The above function defines how the data should be shuffled. The first line creates a temporary object (out) that stores the original data set (data) so that any alterations do not effect the original data set. The second line uses the sample() function to shuffle the first column (the group labels). The third line of the function just returns the shuffled data set.

End of instructions

  Perform randomization test (bootstrapping)
 

> library(boot)
> coots.boot <- boot(coots, stat, R = 100, sim = "parametric", ran.gen = rand.gen)

Error: object 'coots' not found
The sequence begins by ensuring that the boot package has been loaded into memory. Then the boot() function is used to repeatedly (R=100: repeat 100 times) perform the defined statistical procedure (stat). The ran.gen=rand.gen parameter defines how the data set should be altered prior to performing the statistical procedure, and the sim="parametric" parameter indicates that all randomizations are possible (as opposed to a permutation where each configuration can only occur once). The outcome of the randomization test (bootstrap) is stored in an object called coots.boot

End of instructions

  Calculating p-value from randomization test
 

> p.length <- length(coots.boot$t[coots.boot$t >= coots.boot$t0]) + 1

Error: object 'coots.boot' not found

> print(p.length/(coots.boot$R + 1))

Error: object 'p.length' not found
The coots.boot object contains a list of all of the t-values calculated from the resampling (shuffling and recalculating) procedure (coots.boot$t)as well as the actual t-value from the actual data set (coots.boot$t0). It also stores the number of randomizations that it performed (coots.boot$R).

The first line in the above sequence determines how many of the possible t values (including the actual t-value) are greater or equal to the actual t-value. It does this by specifying a list of coots.boot$t values that are greater or equal to the coots.boot$t0 value. (coots.boot$t[coots.boot$t >= coots.boot$t0]) and calculating the length of this list using the length() function. One (1) is added to this length, since the actual t-value must be included as a possible t-value.
The second line expresses the number of randomization t-values greater or equal to the actual t-value as a fraction of the total number of randomizations (again adding 1 to account for the actual situation). This is interpreted as any other p-value - the probability of obtaining our sample statistic (and thus our observations) when the null hypothesis is true.

End of instructions

  Calculating p-value from randomization test

In a t-test, the effect size is the absolute difference between the expected population means. Therefore if the expected population means of population A and B are 10 and 16 respectively, then the effect size is 6.

Typically, effect size is estimated by considering the magnitude of an effect that is either likely or else what magnitude of effect would be regarded biologically significant. For example, if the overall population mean was estimated to be 12 and the researches regarded a 15% increase to be biologically significant, then the effect size is the difference between 12 and a mean 15% greater than 12 (12+(12*.15)=13.8). Therefore the effect size is (13.8-12=1.8).

End of instructions